
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
RFK Jr. wants to scrutinize the vaccine schedule – but its safety record is already decades long18.12.2025 - 2
Relish the World: Notable Caf\u00e9s You Really want to Attempt05.06.2024 - 3
FDA proposes use of sunscreen ingredient popular in other countries11.12.2025 - 4
Dave Coulier reveals he has tongue cancer, his 2nd diagnosis in a year, after beating non-Hodgkin lymphoma02.12.2025 - 5
Allow Innovative Progressions To have a Massive Effect06.06.2024
Figure out How to Remain Persuaded During Your Internet based Degree Program
A decade after Brazil’s deadly dam collapse, Indigenous peoples demand justice on the eve of COP30
British Columbia's Secret Lakeside Town With Hot Springs Is 'An Oasis Of Arts, Culture And Relaxation'
5 Pizza Fixings That Characterize Your Character
The next frontier in space is closer than you think – welcome to the world of very low Earth orbit satellites
Argentina reportedly delaying embassy move over Israeli company's oil project near Falklands
The most effective method to Recognize an Excellent Lab Precious stone
Step by step instructions to Keep up with Ideal Oral Cleanliness at Home
From Loner to Force to be reckoned with: Individual Accounts of Change












